King’s Speech – When Stuttering is Psychological

It didn’t surprise me when Colin Firth won the 83rd Academy Award as the Best Actor for his character as King George VI in “King’s Speech”. He gave his best in the movie – the expression of being a failure could be read aloud and clear on his character.

According to DSM-IV-TR, Stuttering is one of many disorders that usually first diagnosed in childhood, aged 2 and 7 years – with peak onset at around age 5 years. For some cases, Stuttering can recover spontaneously before age 16 years. But no in this King’s case.

Whenever he has to speak up, the King would face his biggest fear – unable to speak clearly and without pauses within a word. He has been trying many ways to heal himself, but had no result, until he met a speech therapist named Lionel Logue – well played by Geoffrey Rush.

The method that was used by Lionel was different and un-orthodox, because he believed that Stuttering was caused by psychological factors. He was working with the based of psychoanalysis point of view. At the same time, he also used some physical trainings to strengthen the muscles that support speaking process.

Lionel’s approach was very personal and appreciate his client – not just the King – as a normal human being. He dig deep on the onset of the disease and consider every emotion or feeling as important. In many scenes, we could see that he used behavioral techniques – rewarding the King with a chance to paint on the plane model or ask a young boy to do behavioral experiment by becoming Lionel’s usher. Considering the set of the happenings, I agree that his method was unorthodox.

Even though the King couldn’t really overcome his condition, he made such a fabulous progress on his first war speech – with Lionel on his side making expressions. It can be said, when someone is at the edge of his nerve, the present of trustworthy others can help that person to achieve his best under circumstances. Lionel was that trustworthy other for the King.

I guess, if only the King met a psychoanalyst, he might get better. But that was just my assumption. The King’s personal well-being has been lifted high with the present of Lionel, who promote self-determination, optimistism, self-efficacy and ability to control the surroundings to the King.

Long live the King!

PS: thanks to Benny who gave the idea of watching this great movie!

Writing is my way to share it to you.

About these ads

5 thoughts on “King’s Speech – When Stuttering is Psychological

    • Kamu sudah nonton filmnya? Perlu utk nonton dulu, spy bisa paham tentang kenapa saya berpikir akan lebih menarik dgn pendekatan Psikoanalisa.

      Banyak scenes yang menunjukkan itu, tapi belum tergali secara mendalam. Misalnya: King George kan seharusnya kidal, tp dipaksa utk pake tangan kanan. Di sana sdh ada konflik internal yg tdk terselesaikan dan memiliki kontribusi ke kondisi stuttering nya. Atau scene dimana King George mengalami kesulitan untuk mengucapkan ‘Father’. Itu juga salah satu bentuk adanya konflik yg dialami subyek dan … Semuanya sudah dilempar ke alam bawah sadarnya. So, thanks to Freud =) kita jadi tahu bhw alam bawah sadar dipenuhi dgn banyak konflik, yg akhirnya muncul dlm bentuk patologis yg dapat terlihat.

      • Sudah nonton bu…
        Owww….
        bagian itu bu bu…
        kalau yang saat dia menceritakan kenapa sampai dia gak lancar bicara itu dia punya pengalaman bahwa dia dulu yang tidak di kasih makan ama pengasuhnya ama pengasuhnya pilih kasih itu bu, menurut ibu itu masuk apa bu?

        Iya bu baru tau kalau masalah-masalah itu jika dimasukan alam bawah sadar maka muncul patologis… :)

        Mungkin sedikit melenceng bu dari topik, boleh saya tanya ga bu bedanya DSM III ama DSM IV-TR itu apa?

      • Banyak kok scenes yang menunjukkan masalah di childhood life of the King. Saya mau beli dvd nya juga – pengen kulihat lagi detilnya =) maklum klinis =p

        Yes, semua konflik yang tdk terselesaikan dan dibuang ke bwh sadar, akan menyebabkan banyak kondisi patologis, Janice.

        Soal DSM, setiap kali revisi selalu ada perubahan. Tapi saya ngga hafal detilnya. Coba kamu cek aja di internet, details apa aja yg berubah di DSM-IV-TR. Kita hrs selalu pakai yg terbaru yah. Satu yg saya tahu, di edisi terakhir ini, homoseksual tidak lagi digolongkan sbg disorder.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s